Well I must admit I truly didn't get disruptive innovation the 1st time around. Here is my second attempt. I am past the anger and onto the discovery!!
Disruptive innovation has impacted the field of education through the invention of web-based instruction. Online bachelors and masters degrees have emerged into the market of education and disrupted the traditional educational system. In addition to post-secondary degrees, we are now beginning to see online programs for K-12. Disruptive innovation is not an improvement on a product or service, but rather the act of “bringing to the market a product or service that actually is not as good as what companies historically had been selling” (Christensen, Horn, & Johnson, 2011). However, this new product or service is oftentimes cheaper, simpler, more accessible, and converts “non-consumers to consumers”(p.47). This translates to the industry of education in that the traditional model of attending class in person, interacting with your professors and peers in a face-to-face setting and physically being in the same place at the same time, has been disrupted by online classes.
Disruptive innovation occurs when there is a need that is not being fulfilled in the traditional market. Traditionally, organizations or companies attend to the highest-tier customer, and products and services are improved to maintain the interest of these customers. This continued changing and improvement of products and services is called sustaining innovation. “Airplanes that fly farther, computers that process faster, cellular phone batteries that last longer, and televisions with clearer images are all sustaining innovations” (p.46). Sustaining innovation is different from disruptive innovation in that disruptive innovations are usually of lower quality, appear in an unexpected fashion, and traditionally surprise companies whose focus is improving their already-successful products.
Historically the invention of the PC exemplifies disruptive innovation. The minicomputer at its inception costs “200,000 and required an engineering degree to operate [it]” (p.48). Apple then began selling the IIe computer marketed for children as a toy. Since children were “non-consumers”, the children nor Apple cared that the quality of computing was poor. Eventually Apple improved upon the PC, thus making way for the unimaginable success of this new market explosion. This was disruptive innovation at its most fundamental level. “Disruption almost always kills such companies, as they lose their customers.” The competing “minicomputer companies were no different; virtually all of them collapsed in the late 1980s” (p. 50). This disruptive innovation of the personal computer was unexpected, began by appealing to “non-consumers”, and shook the computer market.
More recently, online education has disrupted the educational industry. Through sustaining innovation the educational system has invested in tutoring programs, after school programs, educational consultants, and increased staff in order to boost scores and maintain student success and achievement. However, not all students are successful in this traditional learning environment and have not reaped the benefits of this sustaining innovation. Online classes and programs have swept the educational industry, providing solutions to a niche market of those who are simply too busy to attend conventional school due to the constraints of their job, family, or distance. More recently, K-12 programs have forged their way into society offering solutions to children with learning disabilities, physical handicaps, and behavioral issues. K-12 programs have also been successful in reaching high school dropouts, pregnant students, and students who have faced expulsion or dismissal from school.
What the educational system did not anticipate is how online learning has proven to be a definitive catalyst for change in the educational system. The disruptive innovation in online education has evolved into students choosing to attend online school simply because it is more convenient and preferable. In fact it is just plain easier to attend school online. Working mothers and fathers with small children such as me have been given the opportunity to earn a master’s degree while continuing to be a busy teacher, mother, and wife. The disruption has occurred in that now colleges are being forced to keep up by offering an online alternative to classes, simply to keep up with these revolutionary programs such as the one offered by ACU. In looking at my alma mater’s website recently, the University of North Texas, I observed that they now offer online classes through Blackboard, the program that my husband also uses through Houston Community College.
With all of the wonderful advantages of online school, there are also challenges. Critics will state that online students are not receiving a personalized experience that is possible only in person. However, “online learning today accommodates different paces of learning, and some allows students to chose different pathways to learning the material” (p.91). Online learning has changed my life considerably for the better, as I am able to realize my goals from the comfort of my own home. I feel that my online learning is personalized, and I am forging real relationships with my peers and professors, equating to a rich educational experience. I am able to digest the material, talk to peers and colleagues about the information, and burn the midnight oil if needed as to not disrupt family responsibilities. Attending school this way can also be more challenging however, because nothing can replace a meaningful conversation with a professor. Having said that, I have chosen this disruptive innovation of online education and it has greatly benefited both me and my family.
Online education has proven to be a remarkably successful disruptive innovation within the educational industry. It is more convenient for consumers and has taken education by sneak attack. Will traditional learning institutions be crushed by online education? Only time will answer this question.
“Computer-based learning has already planted itself in these foothold markets. It is gaining ‘market share’ at a predictable pace. Like all disruptions, it first appears as a blip on the radar, and then, seemingly out of nowhere, the mainstream rapidly adopts it” (p. 91).
I have been transformed from a “non-consumer” to a “consumer” (p.47) of online education and am thankful for this opportunity. I am confident that the disruptive innovation of online education will transform the education industry for the better, offering a never-before available solution to those who seek out an education in a non-traditional setting.
Resources
Christensen, C.M., Horn M.B., & Johnson, C.W. (2011). Disrupting class: how disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York: McGraw Hill.
Philip R. Stroud said…
ReplyDeleteThank you for your insight into the potential that online learning affords. My organization, STARS Academy—a home-schooling network—is primarily web-based. I think your observation that “What the educational system did not anticipate is how online learning has proven to be a definitive catalyst for change in the educational system” is true in many settings. However, looking both at what is happening in traditional schools, as well as in specialized programs like ours, I’m not sure just how much change is really occurring. Here in Hawai‘i, it appears to be very little.
For my students, I’m not so sure that, as you note, “online education has evolved into students choosing to attend online school simply because it is more convenient and preferable. In fact it is just plain easier to attend school online.” I think most of my students would say that the requirements of online learning are far more challenging for them than if they were in traditional school. For one thing, as my students have noted, school never seems to go away. They feel like school is always in session and there is always more work for them to do—lurking, beckoning, right at their fingertips every time they open a computer—muuuaaahaha! They also soon realize just how disciplined and self-directed they must be to stay on task and get their work done in a timely manner—not easy. It also puts added pressure on parents to be involved in their student’s learning; a great thing, but some parents fuss about it.
I relate to your statement that, “With all of the wonderful advantages of online school, there are also challenges. Critics will state that online students are not receiving a personalized experience that is possible only in person.” This challenge is one with which we often contend and it sometimes gets in the way of parents choosing a program like ours. Christensen et al. (2011) discuss the jobs that clients “hire” education to do, emphasizing that students “want to feel successful and make progress, and they want to have fun with friends” (p 169). But, they don’t describe the particular jobs for which parents hire education: providing quality learning experiences; providing a plethora of social activities; and, don’t forget. “babysitting.” A huge role is providing “day-care”—keeping kids off the streets, out of the workforce, and, hopefully, out of trouble for as long as possible. Online learning can interferes with that. This is why, in our program, students not only come to school on mandatory class days twice a week, but some attend optional self-directed, enrichment days twice a week, as well. Offering this extra supervised time is essential to our marketing plan.
All-in-all, barring a cataclysmic meltdown of the entire cyber system, which could strike from a technological, financial, or even political direction, I would say that online learning can, and probably will, prove to be a disruptive innovation that revolutionizes the U.S. education system at all levels; even though, so far, I think it remains a “sustaining” innovation that merely enriches the traditional system. Take our ACU online classes for example: While it is true that online courses are convenient and provide people like you and me opportunities to participate at a distance, still, I’m finding that the pedagogical methods, strategies, and assessments being used are pretty much “old school.” Or, as cowboy singer-songwriter Michael Martin Murphy says in his song entitled, “Where Do Cowboys Go When they Die / Reincarnation,” – “[Slim], you ain’t changed all that much” (Murphy, n.d.).
References
Christensen, C.M., Horn, M.B., Johnson, C.W. (2011). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Murphy, M.M. (n.d.) Where Do Cowboys Go When They Die. [Online Transcript]. Retrieved July 15, 2011 from http://www.cowboylyrics.com/tabs/murphey-michael-martin/where-do-cowboys-go-3032.html
test
ReplyDeleteI am having trouble posting comments
ReplyDeleteMary Katherine said...
ReplyDeletePhilip thank you so much for your comments, I am practically in tears right now because I am having trouble posting comments in blogger on other people's blogs. When is asks me what profile to use I say Google, and then it takes me to the login screen and kicks me right back to gmail sign in page. I am beyond frustrated. Anyway back to your post, thank you for the great comments. I do agree with your students in that school when taken online, "never goes away". Especially a course of this magnitude. With that being said online education can be much more difficult. I do however feel as though online education is already a disruptive innovation because traditional universities are competing by using the Blackboard onine system. In addition, most od the teachers in my district are opting for online master's programs due to family constraints. Consequently, traditional universities email us weekly offering discounted tuition rates. Maybe this is just the case in my geographical location.
Great paper!!!
ReplyDeleteI agree with you when you said, "I am confident that the disruptive innovation of online education will transform the education industry for the better, offering a never-before available solution to those who seek out an education in a non-traditional setting." If it wasn't for the disruptive innovation of online learning, I would never have been able to go back to school and pursue my goal of obtaining a Master's degree. Working full time, being a mom, and a wife does not allow me a lot of travel time, and without online education I would have had to travel at least 1 1/2 hours to the closest university to pursue my degree. Thank goodness for disruptive innovations making our lives easier!!!
I think I am going to agree with everyone else. I too have been transformed. Online education is the only way besides traveling to class that I could ever think about getting a masters degree. My son is getting his entire undergraduate degree online. He tried to go to class but he wants to work so that wasn't working for him. I am so thankful that he can do this from home. I agree that this disruption is a positive for education.
ReplyDeleteYou have some great examples of sustaining innovations in this piece. Like you I noticed that we are now beginning to see online programs for grade school students K-12. I commented on this on my Facebook and received some comments that reflected that many of my friends and family were unhappy about this. I can see that point of view, especially since I will have a classroom of wiggly 1st graders myself in a couple of weeks. The learning news of six-year-olds is vastly different from those we have in post-grad classes. Innovation that is appropriate is welcome to come in and disrupt our comfortable way of doing things. Sometimes, though, I agree with those you mentioned as critics when you wrote:
ReplyDelete" With all of the wonderful advantages of online school, there are also challenges. Critics will state that online students are not receiving a personalized experience that is possible only in person. However, “online learning today accommodates different paces of learning, and some allows students to chose different pathways to learning the material” (p.91). "
If the innovations brought by digital education add options that we can elect I would support them whole heartedly, but I truly hope that they are not innovations like self-service gas replacing all the full service stations. Sometimes that little bit of quality difference in the old system is worth the extra that we pay for it. So I come to the conclusion that having choices for different paths to learning is good because our learners do have different needs.